Daniel Milavsky vs Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does second serve performance compare? Milavsky has a slight edge with 48.63% of points won on second serves compared to Fierros’ 41.96%, indicating a stronger backup play.
• In terms of returning second serves, Fierros outperforms Milavsky by winning 50.77% of opponents' second serve points, surpassing Milavsky’s 47.16%.
• When it comes to first serve returns, Fierros again leads by capturing 30.89% of these opportunities against Milavsky’s 23.01%.
• Under pressure, Milavsky saves 55.39% of breakpoints, slightly outpacing Fierros who saves 52.77%.
• Overall match performance in the past year favors Milavsky with a 75% win rate, whereas Fierros holds a 51.02% win rate.
• Both players excel on indoor hard courts, with Milavsky boasting an 80% win rate versus Fierros’ 67% on this surface.
• Match experience shows Milavsky primarily competes in tournaments like ITF $10K, winning 80% of matches compared to Fierros’ 56.76% in similar events.
• Average opponent rank in the past year rates higher for Milavsky at 331.94 compared to Fierros’ 365.43, suggesting tough competitor adaptation.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Fierros demonstrates robust resilience with a 75% win rate versus Milavsky’s 59% in such scenarios.
• What about breakpoint conversion rates? Fierros capitalizes more effectively on these opportunities with a 36.25% conversion versus Milavsky’s 29.66%.

Editorial Prediction (July 25, 2025, UTC):

Examining the head-to-head statistics reveals critical insights into both players' strengths and dynamics. Milavsky shows a remarkable performance on second serves and maintains better pressure handling with a slight edge in breakpoint saving capabilities.

Conversely, Fierros excels in both first and second serve returns and showcases superior ability to capitalize on break opportunities. Additionally, if the match intensifies to a deciding set, Fierros has a higher success probability based on past performances.

Despite Milavsky’s overall stronger win rate and experience against higher-ranked players, the match on an indoor hard court could tilt slightly in Fierros’ favor due to his skill in return games and breakpoint conversions.

Considering all factors, especially the critical breakpoint conversion and return capabilities, Fierros is likely to have a slight edge going into this match, making him the probable winner.